#archlinux-ports | Logs for 2017-12-16
Back
[00:08:15] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[00:18:56] -!- because has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
[00:21:28] -!- because has joined #archlinux-ports
[01:54:08] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[02:08:36] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[02:40:40] -!- p71 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
[02:45:19] -!- isacdaavid has joined #archlinux-ports
[03:23:39] -!- p71 has joined #archlinux-ports
[03:55:04] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
[04:06:27] -!- because has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[04:09:16] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[04:10:19] -!- because has joined #archlinux-ports
[04:27:12] -!- because has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
[04:28:19] -!- because has joined #archlinux-ports
[05:09:08] -!- Cthulu201 has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[05:10:51] -!- Cthulu201 has joined #archlinux-ports
[05:55:52] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
[06:08:31] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[06:23:56] -!- p71 has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
[06:26:12] -!- acnut has joined #archlinux-ports
[06:26:20] <acnut> hi all
[06:55:06] -!- jp has quit [Quit: https://ptpb.pw
[06:55:23] -!- jp has joined #archlinux-ports
[06:59:46] -!- p71 has joined #archlinux-ports
[07:22:25] -!- deep42thought has joined #archlinux-ports
[07:45:03] -!- isacdaavid has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[07:55:48] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[07:59:24] -!- deep42thought has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[08:10:12] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[08:18:52] -!- oaken-source has joined #archlinux-ports
[08:32:25] -!- acnut has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
[08:41:48] -!- oaken-source has quit [Quit: leaving]
[09:06:34] -!- abaumann has joined #archlinux-ports
[09:37:46] -!- hringriin has joined #archlinux-ports
[09:57:27] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[10:11:55] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[11:08:40] -!- abaumann has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
[11:51:40] -!- abaumann has joined #archlinux-ports
[11:57:03] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
[12:10:18] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[12:22:37] -!- hringriin has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[12:22:57] -!- hringriin has joined #archlinux-ports
[12:50:59] -!- hringriin has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[13:25:13] -!- hringriin has joined #archlinux-ports
[13:58:45] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
[14:12:02] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[14:16:42] -!- hringriin_ has joined #archlinux-ports
[14:17:10] -!- hringriin has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[14:17:10] hringriin_ is now known as hringriin
[15:17:18] -!- oaken-source has joined #archlinux-ports
[15:59:19] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
[16:13:07] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[17:14:47] -!- because has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
[17:17:13] -!- because has joined #archlinux-ports
[17:27:54] -!- abaumann has quit [Quit: leaving]
[17:35:48] -!- hringriin has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[17:59:33] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
[18:13:43] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[18:55:18] -!- isacdaavid has joined #archlinux-ports
[19:59:45] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
[20:13:22] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[20:28:14] <CalimeroTeknik> abaumann_, you don't need cross-compilation for i586 from i686 at least
[20:28:24] <CalimeroTeknik> (four days later)
[20:29:14] <CalimeroTeknik> and from amd64 it's okay, use the compiler from multilib, run linux32 and you're probably set
[20:46:41] -!- sunshavi has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
[20:52:51] -!- deep42thought has joined #archlinux-ports
[21:24:20] -!- oaken-source has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
[21:27:44] -!- bq has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
[22:00:57] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
[22:03:44] <deep42thought> hmm, the build of maxima with the new sbcl fails in the same way as the build of sbcl failed before: it opens a ldb debugger :-/
[22:05:06] <tyzoid> deep42thought: Could a build-slave theoretically run i686?
[22:05:15] <deep42thought> yes
[22:05:32] <deep42thought> but my guess is, that the systemd-layer makes some issues
[22:05:44] <deep42thought> so I'll try with a plain "makepkg" in a virtual box
[22:05:59] <tyzoid> deep42thought: vagrant init archlinux32/archlinux32 && vagrant up
[22:06:14] <deep42thought> reason: sbcl failed inside the arch32-test box with staging-i686-build, too
[22:06:21] <tyzoid> I threw up a vagrant box several weeks back
[22:06:28] <tyzoid> haven't had a chance to make a new one for December yet, though
[22:06:51] <deep42thought> um, I still use the very first one you gave me
[22:07:00] <tyzoid> :)
[22:07:04] <tyzoid> Both should work just fine
[22:07:14] <tyzoid> anyway, do you have any time to help debug why tyzoid@archlinux32.org is rejected by gmail?
[22:07:45] <deep42thought> how can I help there?
[22:07:48] <deep42thought> but: yes
[22:08:06] <tyzoid> well, I don't have access to the server that processes/forwards the emails, so...
[22:08:59] <deep42thought> I only run the backup mail server
[22:09:05] <deep42thought> the other is from Polichronucci
[22:09:10] <tyzoid> ah
[22:09:45] <tyzoid> Well, next time he's on, can you prod him for that?
[22:09:50] <deep42thought> but IIRC, he set up the mailserver to reject mail from wrong domains, so it might be, that you can't deliver your mail to his server
[22:10:01] <deep42thought> I'll ask him
[22:10:05] <tyzoid> It's inbound mail that's bouncing
[22:10:35] <tyzoid> i.e. if you send something to tyzoid@archlinux32.org, gmail will return a not accepted message.
[22:10:51] <deep42thought> oh
[22:12:06] <tyzoid> yeah. I can always jerry-rig `sendmail -t` to do my bidding, since I've got a server that can send from the domain
[22:12:49] <deep42thought> btw: maxima on arch32-test builds fine ...
[22:13:54] <tyzoid> nice
[22:14:42] -!- guys has joined #archlinux-ports
[22:15:35] <deep42thought> maybe we should add another "straw" to the build script, saying 'throw up a virtual archlinux32 box and compile inside that with makepkg only'
[22:15:58] <tyzoid> wb guys
[22:16:31] <tyzoid> deep42thought: Probably not a bad idea. We'll need to do that anyway if we decide to add i486 to the mix.
[22:17:06] <deep42thought> for i486 I was more thinking of a completely different set of build commands at all
[22:17:14] <deep42thought> but yes, this would also work
[22:17:51] <tyzoid> If we make part of the existing build infrastructure, that means that we could reuse existing build hosts as i486 builders too
[22:18:05] <tyzoid> meaning minimal reconfiguration on the slave side
[22:18:10] <deep42thought> yes
[22:18:30] <tyzoid> btw, do we need more build-slaves?
[22:19:19] <deep42thought> maybe one or two, but that should be really enough, then
[22:19:30] <tyzoid> I'm almost never home, so I could run one on my home system and pause it when I want to utilize it.
[22:19:54] <deep42thought> but keep in mind, that the build slaves may transfer quite some files
[22:20:01] <tyzoid> ah, true.
[22:20:10] <tyzoid> Can it run in a vm?
[22:20:16] <deep42thought> and a slowly uploading build slave will block the build master
[22:20:19] <deep42thought> yes, it can
[22:20:26] <tyzoid> my main dedi runs ubuntu 16.04 :P
[22:20:53] <tyzoid> though, if I run itin a vm, and we add vm initialization as a thing that the buildslaves can do...
[22:20:58] <tyzoid> won't that be a problem?
[22:21:22] <deep42thought> might be
[22:21:47] <tyzoid> I'll probably hold off for now, then.
[22:22:20] <deep42thought> I don't know if you can spin up a vm inside another vm without issues
[22:22:33] <tyzoid> I think you can in qemu, but I don't think you can with virtualbox
[22:23:01] <tyzoid> though qemu might work inside virtualbox
[22:29:00] <deep42thought> ok, I'll go to bed now - goot night!
[22:30:11] <tyzoid> 'night
[22:30:21] -!- deep42thought has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[22:39:04] -!- guys has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
[23:15:30] -!- bq has joined #archlinux-ports
[23:16:13] -!- bq has quit [Client Quit]
[23:17:00] -!- bq has joined #archlinux-ports
[23:45:26] -!- sunshavi has joined #archlinux-ports